Siedell on culture, Christianity and devotion

I’ve just got around to reading Daniel Siedell’s post Great Culture (orginally an address to CIVA) Brilliant. Stop reading my blog and go and read his now. If you need some convincing, try this…

Let me suggest that neither “Christianity” nor “culture” per se make modern society uncomfortable. It is the self-sacrificial and uncompromising pursuit of greatness and quality in these practices, a life singularly devoted to them, which condemns the virtues of contemporary professional and personal life: compromise, mediocrity, and personal comfort that makes modern society uncomfortable.

Are we now too sophisticated, too enlightened, too iconoclastic to believe in the myths of great art, great culture, even the possibility of a great life devoted to Christ? We’re not humble. We’re cowards.

Tags: , ,

good news for the ordinary

I’m trying to think about how we can better help our finalist students, so today I’ve been listening to a talk on work by Mark Greene (of LICC): Vision for Workplace Ministry. Worth a listen. (It takes him about 20 minutes to get to the substantial bit, so don’t give up too soon.)

Given my last post here, this quote particularly stuck out for me:

[The key problem in discipleship & evangelism] is not that we can’t figure out a way to answer the tough questions. It’s that we can’t demonstrate to a watching world a way to live the gospel in a compelling manner in the ordinary, good news for the ordinary.

Tags: , ,

Todd Hunter on the goal of forgiveness

Thanks to Jonny for pointing out the release of Todd Hunter’s new book Christianity Beyond Belief. You can get samples on the IVP site. The following quotes stood out for me, nicely joining up the thoughts rolling around my head this week…

I believe that in responding to Jesus, people do not merely receive forgiveness of sins so they can go to heaven. Rather, they are forgiven so they can begin a different kind of life, a cooperative relationship with God, a new and eternal kind of life right now (which ultimately includes heaven).

Far from trying to make forgiveness less important in the Christian story, my aim is to show that understanding sin in the context of God’s story is crucial to forming a new life, a cooperative friendship with God. I want us to see forgiveness as a starting line, a threshold to a new, fully human life. In my experience, forgiveness is often viewed as a finishing line, with a “whew” and a wipe of the brow while thinking I’m in. I have no quarrel with the notion that forgiveness gets us in. But I want to emphasize that it gets us into a new life story, not merely into heaven when we die.

Tags: , ,

You are the message

All art involves an intimate union between form and content.

In Christianity, the content — the gospel of salvation through Christ — is mediated through the form of the church. The perennial temptation for Christians is to believe that the message can be detached from the community of believers in that message. But the content of faith is precisely that we are members of one body, that Christ is made manifest in our coming together in faith.

Gregory Wolfe in Intruding upon the Timeless
Are we surprised then, that Paul discusses the reconciliation of Jews and Gentiles so much in his letters? The content of his message was reconciliation, so the form must not be one that denies that message. 
We’ve already commented on the importance of performing what we believe. This gives useful alternative perspective on the same issue: If the ‘medium is the message’ and the church is the medium, we better keep a close eye on the message being communicated…

Tags: , ,

not to interpret the text, but perform it (sequel)

Having posted recently about the move from emphasising theory to practice in hard Christian thinking, I was fascinated to come across Andrew Pickering’s performative description of science. My starting point was a CBC postcast on ‘Thinking about science’ (see their podcast page), which includes an interview with Pickering. The interview explicitly touches on this idea as a reaction to modernity (albeit one that emcompasses the modern approach).

I found the whole thing making all sorts of connections, so (when I’m more awake) I’ll probably fire off some reactions to this (elsewhere).

Tags: , ,

Considering Culture (9)

So we are still treking through my no-so-recent seminar on culture (sorry, I didn’t think it would take this long.)

We are at the point of considering the consequences of the biblical story and our place in it. Here are some culturally-related starting points…

First, if we are part of the new creation, our lives should reflect the new creation. We can look at this from many different perspectives. We’ve already quoted 1 Cor 5:17. This may imply more than simply our individual lives are newly created, but it certainly doesn’t say less. We are already — in some sense — part of the new creation and our lives should show that. This must cover all aspects — including our involvement with creation and in culture. To borrow a rough train of thought from Paul — do we think that because the world is going to be re-created that we can exploit the present one and act as if it is optional whether we work in line with the way God want things to function? How can this be?! We have seen the way things should be, the place where mourning disappears, etc. Can we live in a way that subverts this now?

Second, remember that we said that the Creator is glorified by a correctly functioning creation. So, we work with the way things and try to bring them close to God’s intentions be cause that act in itself brings glory to God. Our lives should glorify God by fitting in with that correct functioning.
This isn’t a stale and fixed thing — recall that we said culture was what we did with the freedom that God has given us. One aspect of ‘correct functioning’ is that we use that freedom and act creatively.

Third, in reflecting the new creation now, we proclaim God’s new creation in the present. As Tom Wright points out in an old Veritas talk So What?, we can proclaim in many — including non-verbal — ways. We don’t work for correct operating of creation in the hope that it gives us an opportunity to explain ‘the gospel’, but primarily because such work is a proclamation in itself.

As we said earlier (repeatedly), we know this on the level of personal piety — I bring glory to God by living my life in accordance with His intentions. But we cannot simply restrict ourselves to ourselves to this; we have to let it ripple out into our culture-making — I bring glory to God by working for culture that is in accordance with His intentions (in whatever way is appropriate).

Of course, it will take thinking to understand what this means in the areas we touch. It is not necessarily obvious and we must be sure not to restrict it to catagories that we are comfortable with. For instance, we might be clear about the way all this applies to our personal actions at work (treating others fairly, etc.) but what about the impacts for the products of our work, etc.?

In all this we need to work to understand where we are and to act for healing:

…we should seek to comprehend the good of God-made structures, counter the lies and heal the scars of sin, and contribute to the development of neighbour-loving relationships and God honouring cultural development. The biblical gospel is the good news of the kingdom, the healing and restoratin of creation itself. Jesus himself is constantly referring to his work as the gospel of the kingdom. He offers not only forgiveness but also healing and guidance toward a new way of being human in the world. Jesus cares about healing his diseased creation. He is the good physician, and we are the orderlies instructed to attend to the healing process.
(From The Outrageous Idea of Academic Faithfulness by Opitz and Melleby)

Tags: , , ,